2. Is it a copy of manifesto of other parties or BJP's own? Please decide first. If it is a copy, other parties are equally responsible for the controversial statements.
If BJP is repeating most issues since 2004, is it not their commitment to resolving these issues? In that case, how is this a copy of the manifesto of other parties?
3. Every party needs to address or clarify their stance on basic issues like Infrastructure, Housing, Food, Power, Water, Education, Health, Economic reforms. How can it be termed a copy? In fact, if someone has not addressed some of these, their manifesto is incomplete or limited to some areas only.
4. If the BJP is promising things that INC has also promised, why has INC not implemented those things while they were in power for last decade?
5. We are a cricketing nation - does every team member need to act as wicket keeper or is 1 player enough? Why does every BJP leader need to answer questions related to the manifesto? Why is One point of contact (Murli Manohar Joshi) not enough?
6. Interestingly, taking a stance for "constitutionally resolving Ram Mandir" is communal and Shahi Imam requesting support is secular.
7. Why did other parties not address Section 370, Uniform Civil code, River Integration project, Bullet trains network, etc? How many of these have a successfully working model to support their promises?
No comments:
Post a Comment